Systematic Literature Review
Systematic Literature Review Assignment Help
Literature review has many types one of it is; systematic literature review. It focuses on building connection between multiple research paper and precisely presenting the information in the work. The form needs to be pretty much concise through ample reading and understanding of particular field of study. In simple words, it is actually meant to be an evaluative tool which analyzes multiple studies at once, in order to place it in cohesive review. There are seven key principles behind systematic literature reviews which are Transparency, Clarity, Integration, Focus, Equality, Accessibility, and Coverage.
A technical definition is; The systematic literature review is a protocol/process/method/ in which a body of literature is reviewed, aggregated and assessed although using standardized and pre-specified techniques. To make it clear; the rationale, methods, hypotheses and to reduce bias, the data collection is prepared before reviews and then utilized as a guide to perform the process. Simply like the other traditional literature review, it aims at identifying; critically appraising and summarizing the existing evidence related a well-defined problem.
Systematic Literature review allows ways to examine coincident and conflicting findings, along with it identifies themes that calls for further investigation. Besides, it includes the likelihood of generalizing evidence and evaluating consistency related to specific scientific questions. Therefore, it is of great value in social science field particularly psychology. The method is useful to integrate the information of group of study which investigates the similar phenomenon and generally focuses on particular empirical questions like: “For the well-being of patients particularly diagnosed with depression, does the rational emotive therapy intervention works well?
So if you aren’t aware of the systematic literature review stages, characteristics, and principles than approach to professional native writers, meanwhile get learning hands on this form through literature review sample and literature review examples which guide a lot on how to prepare literature review outline and further process.
Get Excellent Systematic Literature Review Assignment Help Services
The literature review writing services on our platform allows you to hire a writer that matches your needs and holds experience in writing on what you require. All of our experts are knowledgeable in their respective field of study, so whether it is about structuring or finding the sources, they are flexible enough to cater your requirements.
Systematic literature reviews covers characteristics which are as follows:
- The objectives openly well-define a priori
- It explicit pre-determined criteria for exclusion and inclusion of the literature
- It pre-establish search strategy in collecting information and systematic following of the process;
- It pre-built characteristic criteria functional to all utilized sources and present clearly in the review
- Quality of the studies are systematically evaluated and are included in the review
- Excluded sources of literature are identified and justification is present to why it was excluded
- Synthesis/analysis of information (for instance; result comparison, qualitative synthesis of the results and meta-analysis);
- References to the errors and incoherence found in selected material.
At literature review, we make our expert assistance and guidance available to all academic standard students for drafting literate review for thesis, dissertation or any other research project. The teams of research writers are qualified doctorates and professors from prestigious universities in UK such as University of Bristol, University of Edinburgh, University of Warwick, The University of Manchester, Imperial College London and more. Here is how our team of professional writers develop an accomplish literature review at your request.
- At first, formulate the research questions
- Pin down the generalized search on research problems or questions for saving time
- Define both inclusion and exclusion criteria in order to filter the data and information
- Consider various databases to access the pertinent literature
- Analyze pertinent studies and identify literature gap
- Draft the literature review chapter by conceptualizing research study objectives
Get Professional Assistance on Systematic Literature Review
The systematic review is broadly adopted for research experimentation based in health, medical sciences and social science. For example, in order to study the best clinical practice for the issue of irregular heartbeat, it is required to monitor literature time frame and then synthesize the treatments used in the research study. However, there is a need to analyze disseminated, the earlier studies to properly address the research objectives.
We have supervisors and research guiders for both undergraduate and postgraduate students, and here the writers are upright with differed writing styles and related guidelines. With years of experience as assisting scholar, they have a golden experience of managing different types of research projects and literature review forms. Ensuring no bias, our professionals critically evaluates and creates systematic literature review for your dissertation.
Stages of Systematic Literature Review
The process of performing a systematic literature review comprises of several stages that can be clearly reported in the form of original research.
Stage 1: Begin by precisely defining the review objective, while also form a structured question
In the research article it is placed in: Title, Abstract, and Introduction
Objective example: The objective of the literature revision is to systematically analyze and review the current research for instance; the effect of music and tunes on anxiety level of children, in the hospital setting.
Structured research question example: What are the most significant factors linked with the growth of PTSD in soldiers?
Useful tip: In the title part, figure out that the report is a systematic literature review.
Stage 2: Clarify the review methodology and clearly define the eligibility criteria (for instance; the study selection criteria that the published source must meet in order to be included or either excluded from the study). The search should be all-encompassing and extensive.
In the research article it is placed in Methods
Inclusion criteria example: Publication was purely peer-reviewed and academic study. It was a study that investigated the impact of regular physical exercise intervention particularly on depression and comprised of a control group.
Exclusion criteria example: Publication involved male adults. Studies also investigated non-physical activities as interventions and were only published in a language other than the English.
Useful tip: The eligibility criteria occasionally apt to be presented in tables.
3: Get back to eligible literature and meticulously report the search strategy all through the process. (Preferably, at least two independent investigators performs the selection process)
In the research article it is placed in Methods
For Example: The PsychInfo and EBSCOhost are electronic databases from the year 2010 to 2017 that were searched. These were specifically selected due to the psychological focus which for instance includes psychosocial effects of emotional abuse in childhood. The search terms have been ‘childhood’, ‘emotional abuse’, ‘psychosocial consequences’ and psychosocial effects’. PsychInfo created 467, for a total of 667 articles while the EBSCOhost created 200 results just from the search criteria. The articles were rejected if it was determined from the title and the abstract and that the study failed to come across the inclusion criteria. Any uncertainties concerning the application of the selection criteria were greatly resolved through discussions between all the involved researchers.
Useful tip: Often it is better to graphically represent the selection process; as a flow diagram or a decision tree.
Stage 4: Evaluate the methodological quality of particular chosen literature whenever possible; also exclude the articles with low methodological quality. Simply keep in mind that systematic review quality highly depends on quality and validity of the studies involved in the review.
In the research article it is placed in Methods
Examples of the instruments which are available to evaluate the quality of the study: Jadad scale PEDro, the lists of Delphi, Maastricht criteria and OTseeker (used in psychology) and other as per the discipline.
Useful tip: Effectively present the excluded articles, simply as a measure of the selection process which is mentioned in step 3.
Stage 5: Get on with the alleged depiction of the research methods. Simply decide which data to search for in chosen studies and clearly present it in summarized way. If any of the information is missing in any particular paper, do register in the reports. (Preferably, at least two independent investigators performs the characterization of the studies)
In the research article it is placed in Findings and Results
Make your mind what type of data you want to research on, in the specified papers and write it in a concise way. If the data is lacking in few of the paper then always note it down in your report.
Examples of the data that must or can be gathered for the depiction of the literature: Author name, year of publication, sample size, sample design, objectives, research questions, results and limitation
Useful tip: Often findings can be written nicely in a table form characterizing the main traits.
Stage 6: Present a blend of the finding – corporate the finding of separate papers and interpret them in a concise form.
In the research article it is placed in conclusion and interpretation
Design identified as findings should be written in a form of summary either in qualitative or quantitative form. Adjust one or many typical arguments for managing the review. Few of the topics to assist you to perform this is to select two or more key information references like journals, books or newspaper to further elaborate on the results of other paper through a similar means of organization. Accumulate the information recorded by distinct sources and do not just synthesize it. Identify patterns in the findings of different paper, detect them, refer the conceptual argument and try to interpret them. Synthesize the main conclusions and observe the present state on the issue by highlighting the potential future recommendations.
Our experts are well-versed with stages and understand that Systematic Literature Reviews are known for being Systematic, Comprehensive, Documented and Replicable. So hire our experts’ writers to gain excellent results in this form of literature review.
